If recent franchise history is any indication we should probably expect the Bostons Bruins to make some sort of move — or series of moves — prior to the NHL Trade Deadline on Mar. 8.
Not only are they once again one of the best teams in the NHL with an opportunity to make a big Stanley Cup Playoff run, but general manager Don Sweeney has a track record for making big moves.
Three years ago it was Taylor Hall and Curtis Lazar.
Two years ago it was Hampus Lindholm, who also signed a long-term contract to remain in Boston.
A year ago it was Dmitry Orlov and Tyler Bertuzzi.
If Sweeney wants to take a similar swing this season he is going to need to get creative given the Bruins’ lack of salary cap space and the fact their draft pick and prospect pool has been severely depleted in recent years, due in large part to the aforementioned trades.
So let’s take a look at some potential win-win ideas for the Bruins that could help give them the pieces they need for their championship puzzle.
Moving Jake DeBrusk for More Trade Assets
On the surface this would seem to be the exact opposite of what the Bruins would need or want to do at the deadline given their place in the standings.
They are a contender, and moving an NHL roster piece — a potentially productive one — is not something most contenders look to do. But it might be a way for the Bruins to get creative in trying to make a move to improve more pressing needs on the roster.
For one, the Bruins don’t have a lot of trade assets to deal from. They have no first, second, or third round pick this season and no second round pick in 2025. They also have one of the NHL’s thinnest farm systems in terms of prospects. Those two factors severely limit what they can offer around the league to teams that are looking to sell.
Moving DeBrusk could be a way to help get around that.
As a pending unrestricted free agent he wouldn’t have much use for a seller, but if the Bruins could flip him to a buyer — probably preferably in the Western Conference — they might be able to recoup a couple draft picks or a decent prospect that could be used for trade capital in another potential move.
DeBrusk has been involved in trade speculation for a couple of years now, but there might be a sensible argument for moving him now. His production has dropped, they could use an additional pick or prospect, and it would also clear a $4 million contract from their cap. It would open up a lot of other options to further strengthen the roster.
Noah Hanifin or Chris Tanev From Calgary
This level of addition might require the Bruins to first make a trade like the aforementioned DeBrusk move. Not only to get the type of assets the Flames would need to complete a deal for Hanifin or Tanev, but also to create the salary cap space that would needed to fit them into this year’s roster.
But it might be an ideal type of sequence if the Bruins could pull that off.
Mainly because defense has quietly become one of Boston’s biggest needs. While it is true that the Bruins are fourth in the NHL in goals against per game (only 2.64 against per game), almost all of that success comes from their goalie duo of Linus Ullmark and Jeremy Swayman. That duo has combined for a .915 all situations save percentage, which is the second-highest mark in the league.
That has also masked a lot of the Bruins’ defensive flaws and shortcomings that have lurked beneath the surface all season.
Some numbers to consider.
- The Bruins have allowed 2.97 expected goals per 60 minutes (all situations), ranking them 14th in the NHL.
- Their 28.3 scoring chances against per 60 minutes and 11.9 high-danger scoring chances against per 60 minutes rank 16th and 20th in the NHL respectively.
- Their penalty kill for the season is 81.2 percent and has dropped down to 11th in the NHL for the season and is only at 75 percent (26th in the NHL) since Dec. 1.
Defense is a huge need, and may have even overtaken center as the Bruins’ main focus.
Hanifin or Tanev would be a natural fit, and if they could flip DeBrusk they would have the salary cap space to easily land either player. It could also give the Bruins an opportunity to repeat what they did with Lindholm and sign either to a long-term contract extension given all of the money they have coming off the books after this season.
If the Bruins felt confident in the ability to re-sign somebody like Hanifin, something like prospect Fabian Lysell and a draft pick (perhaps one acquired in another trade) could be a potential win-win for both sides.
Alexandre Carrier From the Nashville Predators
While Hanifin or Tanev would be a big upgrade to the Bruins’ top-four on defense, they would also require a significant trade and a lot of potential moving pieces to make it happen.
If the Bruins wanted to think smaller and simply upgrade their third-pairing — which they could absolutely use — Nashville’s Alexandre Carrier would be a really strong option at a cheaper price.
He counts $2.5 million against the cap for this season, is a pending unrestricted free agent and would be an ideal third-pairing player for any potential contender.
He is not going to light up the scoreboard offensively, but he does have some scoring potential for a third-pairing role and is an extremely sound, smart defensive player that tends to always find himself in the right spot. The only thing Boston might not love about him is he does not have great size or strength and isn’t really a physically imposing defender. But there is a lot to be said for being in the right spot and making smart plays.
The Predators are still on the fringes of playoff contention in the Western Conference, but they are rapidly trending in the wrong direction. They have not won a playoff series since 2018 and seem to be on their way to a second straight non-playoff season. Selling seems like a logical approach, and given Carrier’s contract status as a pending unrestricted free agent he would be a likely trade candidate to bring back a second-round draft pick or mid-level prospect.
Nic Dowd From the Washington Capitals
At the start of the season center would have looked to be the Bruins’ biggest need.
Not only simply acquiring a center, but potentially a top-line center.
With Patrice Bergeron and David Krejci retiring, and nobody being brought in from outside the organization to replace them, it left their top-two center spots in the hands of Charlie Coyle and Pavel Zacha. That did not seem to be an ideal situation for a potential Stanley Cup contender.
While that still might be true, Coyle and Zacha have done an outstanding job filling the top-two spots and there might not be a realistic upgrade that the Bruins could pursue.
Adam Henrique is the top rental center available, but is he enough of an upgrade over what Coyle and Zacha have provided to justify the cost to acquire him? Doubtful, even if it would significantly improve their depth down the middle.
A 1-2-3 punch of Coyle-Henrique-Zacha would be lacking a star, but there would not really be a weakness there.
But again … the cost. And also trying to make the salary work. It would just require a lot of moving parts that the Bruins may not have.
Dowd isn’t a rental and is still under contract for one more full season, but his salary cap hit is only $1.3 million per season and he would be a really strong addition to the bottom-six. That extra year of term might bump up the trade cost a little bit, but it might be worth it for the extra year of cost certainty and depth.
The Capitals are facing a huge uphill battle to make the playoffs in the Eastern Conference and would be wise to shop Dowd now when his value is at its absolute highest point.
Leave a Reply